logo

Blog

Chevron right icon

Blog article

Best Headphones for Audiophiles: A Musician’s Buying Guide

Choose headphones for recording, mixing and critical listening. Compare six wired options, test them with your own music and check the final export.

Share this post

Best Headphones for Audiophiles: A Musician’s Buying Guide

The best headphones for audiophiles who make music depend on the job. For vocals or instruments recorded near a microphone, start with a closed-back pair such as the ATH-M40x or MDR-7506. For critical listening in a quiet room, consider an open-back pair such as the HD 560S.

If you need one pair for both jobs, prioritise isolation and fit, then check your mixes on another playback system.

Table of contents

Table of content

  • Introduction

  • Key Takeaways

  • Do you need isolation or a quiet listening space?

  • Which wired headphones should you audition?

  • Will they work with your existing output?

  • How do you compare headphones fairly?

  • Test a vocal take, then the rough mix

  • Should you use headphone EQ?

  • Check the fit before changing the mix

  • Check the exported track before release

  • Frequently Asked Questions

  • Conclusion

Key Takeaways

  • Choose closed-back headphones for microphone tracking; consider open-back headphones for listening in a quiet space.

  • Try the headphones you already own before buying. Use a familiar reference track and another playback system to judge what you hear.

  • Check fit, cable, connector and usable volume on your actual computer or interface, not impedance alone.

  • Compare candidates at similar perceived loudness using both a familiar recording and your own track.

  • Listen to the exported file on the headphones and another system before deciding it is ready to deliver.

Do you need isolation or a quiet listening space?

Good headphones help you hear details consistently: a quiet vocal consonant, a reverb tail or a bass note that disappears. They cannot tell you by themselves how the song will sound on speakers, a phone or somebody else’s earbuds. Treat a second playback system as a translation check, not proof that one pair is defective.

Closed-back headphones: Start here when a live microphone could pick up headphone playback, or when the room is noisy. Check the seal and whether the earcups become uncomfortable during a full session.

Open-back headphones: Consider them for focused listening in a quiet room. Sound escapes and outside noise enters, so they are a poor default beside a live vocal microphone.

Example: a vocal in an untreated bedroom: Start with closed-back headphones. Play the loudest part of the backing track at a comfortable level while recording a short vocal test, then listen to the recording for backing-track bleed. If it is audible, check the earcup seal and reduce headphone level before judging the microphone or the mix.

Which wired headphones should you audition?

These six models are candidates by use, not tested winners. Compare current total cost, including replacement pads, cables and any adapter you need, before treating a higher-priced model as an upgrade.

For recording: ATH-M40x and MDR-7506

Consider the ATH-M40x if you need isolation and value detachable cables. Check its fit and supplied cable options against your workspace. The MDR-7506 is another closed-back wired candidate; its long coiled cable may suit a recording position but be awkward at a compact desk. Compare both on your own output rather than choosing from their specifications alone.

For quiet-room listening: HD 560S

Consider the HD 560S if you mainly listen or edit in a quiet room and want an open-back design with a detachable cable. It is not the pair to choose for isolation. Sennheiser says an amplifier is not required for this model; still test it with the output you intend to use.

Further options: DT 700 PRO X, DT 900 PRO X and HD 600

For an isolation-focused alternative with a removable cable, consider the closed-back DT 700 PRO X. If you already have a tracking pair and want an open-back option for quiet-room listening, compare the DT 900 PRO X and HD 600. The HD 600’s 300-ohm specification is a reason to test your intended output, not an automatic instruction to buy an amp. For all three, check comfort, connection and available replacement parts before spending more.

Comparison of closed-back and open-back headphones for musicians, showing suitable tasks, example models and checks before buying.

Will they work with your existing output?

The no-new-purchase setup is your existing wired headphones, a compatible computer or audio-interface output, a familiar reference recording and another playback system you can access. Plug the headphones into the output you will actually use. Check that the connector fits, both channels play, there is no distracting hiss or distortion, and a comfortable listening level is available without pushing the output to its limit.

Upgrade to solve a specific problem: add a closed-back tracking pair if playback leaks into recordings, or a complementary open-back pair if you can listen in a quiet space. Consider a different headphone output or amplifier only if your intended combination proves inadequate. Impedance alone cannot determine usable loudness, so assess the particular output and listening level. If you need help with the rest of the recording chain, see how to record music at home on a budget.

How do you compare headphones fairly?

For listening, the path is a DAW session or reference file, then the computer or audio interface, then wired headphones. Use the same file and playback path when comparing pairs where possible. A lossless reference file is a useful way to keep the source consistent, but changing to a higher sample rate will not resolve a poor fit or an unreliable comparison.

For recording, decide how you will hear the live input. On supported Focusrite interfaces, direct monitoring sends it towards the headphones while the DAW records it. If you use that route, mute the recording track’s software-monitor path so you do not hear a second, delayed version of the same performance. If you instead monitor through the DAW for live effects, check the session’s latency and avoid simultaneously hearing the direct path. Controls vary by interface.

  1. Choose one familiar, well-produced song and one of your own rough mixes. Use the same passages on every pair.

  2. Set a comfortable level, then match perceived loudness as closely as you can when switching. A louder pair can seem more impressive without revealing more useful information.

  3. Listen for lead-vocal intelligibility, kick versus bass, sibilance, reverb tails and left-right balance. Note what you hear before switching; also notice seal, pressure and fatigue.

  4. Replay the questionable passage on another familiar system. Change the mix only after deciding whether the problem follows the song or stays with one listening device.

Test a vocal take, then the rough mix

Return to the bedroom vocalist. After the closed-back bleed test, record a short verse while monitoring through just one input path. Listen back for delayed doubling, backing-track spill and whether the singer can hear the pitch and timing clearly. Correct the monitoring route or headphone level before recording the full take. For a wider explanation of recording paths, see how to record music.

When the rough mix is ready, the musician compares its chorus with the reference at a similar perceived level. The bass sounds balanced on the tracking headphones but too prominent on another familiar system. Rather than immediately cutting bass, they replay the same passage on both systems and check whether the reference changes in a similar way. If the problem belongs to their song across systems, they can revisit the mix; if it appears on one device only, they record the discrepancy and avoid an impulsive EQ change.

Should you use headphone EQ?

A matching AutoEq profile can give you settings to try, but AutoEq does not apply them: you need a separate compatible EQ app. Check that app’s availability and cost before planning around it. A profile is not a measurement of your particular pair or your ears; fit, seal and unit variation can change what you hear.

Check the export as well as the monitor path: If you audition with headphone EQ, compare it on and off at similar perceived loudness and leave headroom for any digital boosts. Before delivery, play the actual exported song with monitoring EQ off to check that the headphone correction has not been printed into the release file.

Check the fit before changing the mix

Do not buy from driver type, advertised frequency range or price alone. The useful question is whether the pair fits, connects to your equipment and helps you make repeatable decisions for your task. If bass changes when you reposition an earcup, check the seal before altering a mix. If every track seems harsh after a long session, take a break before deciding the headphones or master need EQ.

Keep the level comfortable and take breaks. WHO safe-listening advice considers both volume and duration; a computer’s volume-slider percentage does not measure sound pressure at your ear.

Check the exported track before release

The bedroom vocalist’s last audition uses the exported single, not only the DAW session. Use this short check for your own finished file:

  1. Open the actual export. Confirm that it starts and ends as intended, plays through, and has the expected left and right channels.

  2. Listen for clicks, unintended distortion, excessive sibilance and vocal or bass-balance problems. Recheck any suspect moment rather than relying on memory.

  3. Play it on another familiar system. Compare it with a suitable reference at a similar perceived level before making a final mix decision.

  4. Confirm that the delivered file matches your chosen distributor’s current format requirements. Do not assume one universal bit depth or sample rate.

If the listening checks reveal work still needed on the finished mix, compare mastering options. Once the file is ready, use the release guide for the wider distribution process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the highest quality headphones for music?

There is no task-independent winner. For a musician, the most useful pair fits comfortably, works with the intended output and makes problems in their own tracks easier to identify without creating recording bleed. Audition candidates with the same familiar passages instead of treating price or specifications as a quality ranking.

Are open-back or closed-back headphones better for music production?

Choose closed-back when isolation matters, especially beside a live microphone. Consider open-back for critical listening when the room is quiet and leakage will not disturb anyone. If you can own only one pair and record vocals, start by testing a closed-back option.

Do I need a DAC or headphone amplifier?

Not automatically. First try the headphones on the computer or interface you plan to use. If you cannot reach a clean, comfortable listening level, investigate that output and the headphone’s requirements before buying more hardware. Impedance is one consideration, not the whole decision.

Can I use wireless headphones to check a finished song?

Yes, as a check of how a listener may hear it. Keep a wired path as your repeatable production reference, particularly for live monitoring. Do not assume a lossless source remains lossless over Bluetooth: Apple says the Bluetooth connections used by its specified AirPods and most Beats wireless headphones are not lossless.

Conclusion

Start with the headphones and output you have. Audition one closed-back candidate if you record near a microphone, or an open-back candidate if quiet-room listening is the priority; then check your own exported track on another system before buying or releasing anything.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay updated with the latest Muso news, tips, and success stories. Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss an update!

By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy and provide consent to receive updates from our company.


Back to top